Modern Tubes in the UL40-S2
 

 

It is already several years ago that I designed the UL40-S2 tube-amplifier. In those days tubes were easy to get. I used NOS-EL34’s from Philips and later from Svetlana (with gold-control-grid). Abundant tubes were available, because of  their application in quality guitar amplifiers.

Now the situation has changed a little bit. Svetlana ceased production. I also received many requests from customers to apply other tubes like 6550 or KT88. In the last years we saw the birth of new tubes from Tung-Sol, like the KT120 en very recently the KT150. I tried all these tubes in the UL40-S2, and they performed fine. Only the KT88 sometimes showed a little tendency to oscillation, which I have described and solved. See an earlier report on my website.

To inform you all about the present situation, I performed a new test with 14 types/brands. I plugged these tubes into the original UL40-S2. I measured the quiescent current I0, the anode plus grid-2 dissipation Pa+g2 and the distortion of a 1 kHz sine at a level of 1 Watt into a 4 Ohm load. I also calculated the class-A power range (both tubes are working). To my satisfaction all tubes operated in this class-A almost to the maximum output power Pout,max = 25 W. All tubes settled themselves to a working point below their maximum dissipation Pa,max.  The tube with the lowest THD gets the highest ranking. See the results of my test in the following list.

VALVE

I0

Vak

Pa+g2

Pa,max

THD @ 1kHz

Ranking

Remark

units

mA

V

W

W

%

1 to 10

Pout,max ,UL40S2 = 25 W

EL34 Tung-Sol

59

337

20

25

0,13

2

Pout to 20 W in class A

EL34S Shuguang

53

343

18

25

0,19

1

Pout to 18 W in class A

LL34 L’Atout

60

336

20

25

0,1

4

Pout to 20 W in class A

6550 Tung-Sol

79

321

25

42

0,13

2

Pout to 25 W in class A

6550 SED

75

325

24

40

0,09

5

Pout to 24 W in class A

6550C Svetlana
(Gold grid version)

77

318

24

40

0,11

3

Pout to 24 W in class A
Manufacturing ceased

6550WE Sovtek

81

321

26

40

0,13

2

Pout to 25 W in class A
I0 slightly too large

KT66 Gold-Lion Genalex

71

328

23

32

0,073

7

Pout to 23 W in class A
Does not fit under cover

KT77 Gold-Lion Genalex

60

336

20

28

0,032

10

Pout to 20 W in class A

KT88 Gold-Lion Genalex

73

326

24

40

0,11

3

Pout to 24 W in class A

KT88 JJ-Electronic

76

325

25

40

0,11

3

Pout to 25 W in class A

KT90EH Elektro Harmonix

71

329

23

50

0,045

9

Pout to 23 W in class A
Does not fit under cover

KT120 Tung-Sol

78

324

25

60

0,055

8

Pout to 25 W in class A
Does not fit under cover

KT150 Tung-Sol

 

82

 

319

 

26

 

70

 

0,08

 

6

 

Pout to 25 W in class A
I0 slightly too large
Does not fit under cover

The absolute winner is the KT77. This tube looks like the EL34 and LL34 tubes. They all show a quiescent current of about 60 mA, well within the original design range. No changes in the UL40-S2 design are needed for, it all is totally correct. I find the low distortion of the KT77 remarkable and very noticeable. See in this regard also my SE-amplifier research where I indicate the importance of low 2-nd harmonic distortion for the clear perception of space and details: http://mennovanderveen.nl/images/ts2016/1-TS2016-report-Menno.pdf. I there also explain why it is important to measure harmonic distortions at 1 Watt output level.

All other tubes have higher quiescent currents ranging from 70 mA to 82 mA. For these tubes I advise a small change in the schematics of the UL40-S2. The cathode resistor R17 = 220 Ohm is standard a 5 W type. It is better to change it into a 7 Watt type. The cathode decoupling capacitor C6 is standard 1000uF/40V . As result of the larger quiescent currents the 40V voltage headroom becomes rather small. I advise to change C6 into a 1000uF/63V type to create abundant headroom. Ask Amplimo (www.ringkerntrafo.nl) for the availability of R17 and C6 and most of the tubes in my test-list.

A last remark: when you apply the Vanderveen-Tentlabs auto-bias unit in the UL40-S2, you can set the quiescent current at any value you like. For all the tubes 60 mA is a good choice, to extend the life-span of the tubes and to get a wide class-A range. No changes in R17 and C6 are needed for, because these components are removed when you apply the auto-bias unit.

With many thanks to Jack van Brederode (TubeSociety student) who informed my about the good qualities of the KT77.

29-6-2017  Menno van der Veen